From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb16c447b2139225 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Rational APEX Ada95 w/ X11R6 Date: 1999/06/15 Message-ID: <7k6cr9$qk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 489958319 References: <929466176.893.35@news.remarQ.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jun 15 20:25:29 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-06-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <929466176.893.35@news.remarQ.com>, "Brian Kelly" wrote: > Has anyone programmed using Rational's Ada95 compiler and X11R6? > > If so, have you come up w/ any concurrency issues/problems? > > I'm currently looking into the feasability of putting these two products > together for future products. More specifics would help. For instance, you will need bindings to X. Some very literal (or "thin") bindings are available, as are some thicker ones that do nifty things like synchornize access so that the calls are task-safe. But what's available to you depends on your compiler/OS combination. -- T.E.D. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.