From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4cdd9ccfb8ede
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: muddy_buddy@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: How many different processors do you use?
Date: 1999/06/11
Message-ID: <7jrmcd$nbg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 488490129
References: <7j1qng$4fp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37576ded.26569745@news.mpx.com.au>
 <7j8ac0$eah$1@uranium.btinternet.com> <7jh07e$tek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jhp34$6f1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jjij7$qci$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jk7hk$36s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jm5pa$ome$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jmmqi$vm2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jmr4i$1c1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jn75i$5d5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jomhf$l5e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jonoo$lnk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jpbev$s9c$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 138.126.255.195
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jun 11 19:00:33 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.51 [en] (WinNT; U)
Date: 1999-06-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7jpbev$s9c$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>,
  rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love ) wrote:
> In <7jonoo$lnk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> dennison@telepath.com wrote:
> > In article <7jomhf$l5e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> >   muddy_buddy@my-deja.com wrote:
> > > In article <7jn75i$5d5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> >
> > > modules.  Like I said, I like Ada.  However if the Legacy TI part
of
> > > Raytheon is typical of Raytheon as a whole, that alone would be a
big
> > > chunk of the defense industry in the US.  I also admit, due in
part
> to
> > > dislike of Ada, we never tried Ada 95 in any of the programs I
> worked.
> > >
> >
> > That's odd. A year and a half ago I got no less than 3 job offers
from
> > various TI sites in the N. Dallas area to do Ada work. Have things
> > changed that drasticly?

Less than 1/2 of the Engineering work went to Tucson.  The RADAR and
FLIR group remain here, and as far as
I know they are not using Ada for NEW projects, I could  Of course
be wrong.  As Far as I know Raytheon has never refused to use Ada or any
other language, its their money after all. There are
plenty of on going projects that use Ada.  My project uses Ada to
support existing code, and
I sure that if the new tools are as good as you say, we may buy new
tools for supporting old code.  However the Government itself is
funding a move to C on one project, I understood they ask for a bid to
convert a Working system written in Ada to C.  Part of this was due to
a dated, and overly expensive processing board in a system with a lot
of up coming spin-offs, and part was fear of lack of Ada support for
future processors.  It has always depended on which branch of the
military you work for.


>  I believe that the compiler went
> to Phoenix under DDC-I.
>
> Note that Raytheon in Houston is using Ada for NASA work.
That is proably a good place for it, but did NASA use Ada for
Pathfinder?

>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>  Bob Love                                   MIME & NeXT Mail OK
>  rlove@neosoft.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

--
Raytheon, ATT or Any other company may or may
not agree with any thing I say, write or think.

Muddy


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.