From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f849b,857262ad7d0ad537
X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4cdd9ccfb8ede
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: muddy_buddy@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: How many different processors do you use?
Date: 1999/06/11
Message-ID: <7jrlph$n6r$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 488486949
References: <7j1qng$4fp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37576ded.26569745@news.mpx.com.au>
 <7j8ac0$eah$1@uranium.btinternet.com> <7jh07e$tek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jhp34$6f1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jjij7$qci$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jk7hk$36s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jm5pa$ome$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jmmqi$vm2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jmr4i$1c1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jn75i$5d5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jomhf$l5e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jpi5t$g7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 138.126.255.195
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jun 11 18:50:27 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.51 [en] (WinNT; U)
Date: 1999-06-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7jpi5t$g7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
> In article <7jomhf$l5e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
>   muddy_buddy@my-deja.com wrote:
> > In article <7jn75i$5d5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> >   Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > In article <7jmr4i$1c1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
>
> > I doubt that Reagen was ever capable of understanding the
> > differences between programing languages.  My point, was the
> > general policy was responsible for the lack of government
> > funded efforts.
>
> But once again, this is totally irrelevant. In fact the
> government spent LOADS of money on Ada, including sums well
> into the tens of millions of dollars on generating a free
> Ada compiler (ALSN). Unfortunately this compiler was not
> sufficiently useful to be widely used.
When did they do this?  If they did they didn't do what I would
have, by hiring the most popular tool manufacturer(or maybe the top
two) and have them develop Ada tools with better support than
their best selling product.


>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>

--
Raytheon, ATT or Any other company may or may
not agree with any thing I say, write or think.

Muddy


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.