From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,47a4be9898f849f0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Linking FORTRAN77 to Ada83
Date: 1999/06/10
Message-ID: <7jos49$nlq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 487944665
References: <375ECA88.CF7CFF7E@sll.northrop.com>
 <IWzafrus#GA.184@newstoo.hiwaay.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x42.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jun 10 17:20:22 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-06-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <IWzafrus#GA.184@newstoo.hiwaay.net>,
  "David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote:

>   1.  You probably need pragma Interface_Name (root, "root");
>       to associate
>       the case insensitive Ada name you declared in the pragma
>       Interface
>       with the symbol produced by your Fortran compiler, for
>       which the linker
>       will seek to resolve.  This pragma would follow the
>       pragma Interface.
>       Check your compiler's documentation, Appendix F.

There is no such pragma in either Ada 83 or Ada 95, so this is
curious advice. Yes, some particular implementation might
provide this as an implementation dependent pragma, but given
that this was a general question, it seems odd to suggest
using something so non-standard.



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.