From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	LOTS_OF_MONEY,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f849b,857262ad7d0ad537
X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4cdd9ccfb8ede
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: muddy_buddy@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: How many different processors do you use?
Date: 1999/06/10
Message-ID: <7jomks$l7q$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 487920697
References: <7jmr4i$1c1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <IkG73.961$2m.35070@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 138.126.255.193
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jun 10 15:46:40 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.51 [en] (WinNT; U)
Date: 1999-06-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <IkG73.961$2m.35070@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>,
  tmoran@bix.com wrote:
> > > If you think an international standard can be achieved any
> > > quicker than it was, you just don't know how standards proceed.
> > > FYI, the Ada standard process was FAR FAR faster than the C
> > > or C++ processes.
> >
> > Perhaps the offical process was, but there were C compliers out
before
> > the sign off.  Its that true of Ada 95?
>   I have a set of floppies here labeled "Janus/Ada 9X 386 Extender
> Ver 3.0.3" with a "most recent file" date in March 1993.  I was
> using it for commercial (ie not toy, not research, not defense) work.

How could you possibly use a non-qualified Ada complier for work?  I
thought that was a strict No-No.
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.