From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,33c2f396f345ec59
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: FRAC tool?
Date: 1999/06/09
Message-ID: <7jmnk0$vvv$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 487637721
References: <hQT%2.24$Wu1.441@news.flash.net>
 <7itrtj$l8t$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk> <wcclndti94g.fsf@world.std.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x42.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jun 09 21:50:59 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-06-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <wcclndti94g.fsf@world.std.com>,
  Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com> wrote:
> Given that declarations in Ada *are* executable, it's hard to
> see what to measure here.  Comments and blank lines are not
> executable, I guess.
> ;-)
I would measure statements that generate some code, that
seems a reasonable and well defined criterion (it's where
for example gdbtk let's you put a breakpoint :-)

I think it is a bit specious to consider

  A : Integer;

as executable in the absence of Normalize_Scalars.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.