From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b2d73e60acd3f07
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Estimating conversion of Ada 83 to Ada 95
Date: 1999/06/08
Message-ID: <7jk0gp$if$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 487195414
References: <7jj9kr$2hr$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x31.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jun 08 21:04:34 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-06-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7jj9kr$2hr$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net>,
  "Terry J. Westley" <twestley@buffalo.veridian.com> wrote:
> I expect we'll use the GNAT Ada83 switch for the first pass,
> then turn it off to see what happens.

The GNAT Ada 83 switch is intended for those who are building
Ada 95 code that has for some reason to remain backwards
compatible with Ada 83. It is completely irrelevant for the
purposes of converting Ada 83 code to Ada 95.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Tecnologies


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.