From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fbd3a4df7893995d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT/Ada Traceback Information?
Date: 1999/06/06
Message-ID: <7jf1ti$925$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 486458103
References: <375AB243.F2176DA5@voyager.net>
 <7jerlk$bt9$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 166.72.70.236
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Jun 06 23:57:40 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-06-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7jerlk$bt9$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>,
  mgk25@cl.cam.ac.uk (Markus Kuhn) wrote:
> Symbolic tracebacks (and also core dumps for non-handled
> exceptions  with the stack fully intact) would be a wonderful
> help in handling Murphy's law variant 42b that there is "The
> most interesting and difficult to reproduce bugs always show
> up when you are not running the debugger."

One useful thing to remember is that gdb is completely
non-intrusive. What a lot of people do throughout the
development process is to *always* run under gdb. There is
really no downside in doing this for many programs, and that
way if something happens, you can grab control without needing
to reproduce the problem

As for tracebacks, they have been available for some time on
some targets, and indeed 3.12a will add this capability for
additional targets. To find out the status of traceback support
for various targets now and in the future, contact
sales@gnat.com.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.