From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,753e293b5474aeae
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Java Out, Linux In
Date: 1999/06/04
Message-ID: <7j97r8$l0d$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 485747823
References: <37589012.2683919@news2.ibm.net> <1999Jun4.062135.1@eisner>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Jun 04 19:02:07 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-06-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1999Jun4.062135.1@eisner>,
  Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote:
> Well, if they abandon a language in favor of an operating
> system, who could argue ?   I think I will trade my lawnmower
> in for an
> OO methodology.

That's not really a fair comment. When Java is used in
connection with thin clients like this, it is intended as
meaning a Java-only based machine, i.e. the case in which
the Java environment does indeed function as a replacement
for the operating system.



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.