From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5eb8ca5dcea2827 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1008e3,a7084fcfbc5ce2fb X-Google-Attributes: gid1008e3,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Ada OO Mechanism Date: 1999/06/03 Message-ID: <7j4tu0$563$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 485111502 References: <7i05aq$rgl$1@news.orbitworld.net> <7i17gj$1u1k@news2.newsguy.com> <7icgkg$k4q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3749E9EC.2842436A@aasaa.ofe.org> <7id2eo$fag@drn.newsguy.com> <3749FF7D.F17CE16A@aasaa.ofe.org> <374AC676.F7AE0772@lmco.com> <374F1DD3.64070C3E@mitre.org> <7ircia$ued@drn.newsguy.com> <928161154.329.88@news.remarQ.com> <7j4nro$1ft@drn.newsguy.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jun 03 03:48:18 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3 X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-06-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7j4nro$1ft@drn.newsguy.com>, mike@nospam wrote: > which made my C/C++ more pleasent for me to work one, and more > readable. > This kind of thing is VERY bad style. One of the primary things that you should consider in writing code is to make it pleasant for OTHERS to work on and read. Adopting non-standard idiosyncratic styles (your C/C++ example, if not intended as a joke, is an extreme example), is in the worst tradition of deliberate code obfuscation. Conformity to both formal and informal standards in programming is an important part of good style. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.