From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bcdac28207102750
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada95 speed
Date: 1999/06/02
Message-ID: <7j26ph$8c8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 484685143
References: <374182F2.B10AD449@Maths.UniNe.CH>
 <3741aa37.3892645@news.pacbell.net> <3741B203.4890880B@Maths.UniNe.CH>
 <7ht4ss$4mu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3743D5BB.37152F94@gte.net>
 <310519991456230875%hopperj@macconnect.com> <3753DA33.F2E088A0@gte.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x21.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jun 02 03:01:09 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-06-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3753DA33.F2E088A0@gte.net>,
  cnelson9@gte.net wrote:

> It took a few micro seconds to display the
> result of the computations.

No, that's obviously wrong, presumably this is a misprint
for milliseconds (remember that the scan speed of typical
displays of the period was 30-60Hz)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.