From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,31b8879c52cdbc65
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pascal Obry"
Subject: Re: Gnat on OpenVMS
Date: 1999/05/27
Message-ID: <7ij3l5$lkd$1@clnews.edf.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 482657567
References: <7hshfq$5tc$1@front1.grolier.fr>
<7i6aur$i1g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7i74fa$9e2$1@front6.grolier.fr>
<1999May22.193351.1@eisner> <7i98hl$d8a$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
<1999May24.232851.1@eisner>
<7if0bu$mph$1@front5.grolier.fr>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Organization: EDF
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id:
Thierry Lelegard a �crit dans le message :
7if0bu$mph$1@front5.grolier.fr...
> > ..., and having a compiler would be much more important
> > than having the best debugger.
>
> Two points I would like to comment:
> 1. compiler more important than debugger
> 2. best debugger
>
> 1. I think that the compiler and the debugger are (almost)
> equally important. Once an application is written by the
> average human programmer, it usually does not work (and
> PLEASE do not tell me that this not true with Ada, I have
> seen horrible things in Ada due to horrible programmers).
So, what about fixing the programmers ? :-)
But don't hold you breath, GDB wont be able to debug programmers
for at least one more century :-)
Pascal.