From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,31b8879c52cdbc65 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pascal Obry" Subject: Re: Gnat on OpenVMS Date: 1999/05/27 Message-ID: <7ij3l5$lkd$1@clnews.edf.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 482657567 References: <7hshfq$5tc$1@front1.grolier.fr> <7i6aur$i1g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7i74fa$9e2$1@front6.grolier.fr> <1999May22.193351.1@eisner> <7i98hl$d8a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999May24.232851.1@eisner> <7if0bu$mph$1@front5.grolier.fr> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Organization: EDF X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-05-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Thierry Lelegard a �crit dans le message : 7if0bu$mph$1@front5.grolier.fr... > > ..., and having a compiler would be much more important > > than having the best debugger. > > Two points I would like to comment: > 1. compiler more important than debugger > 2. best debugger > > 1. I think that the compiler and the debugger are (almost) > equally important. Once an application is written by the > average human programmer, it usually does not work (and > PLEASE do not tell me that this not true with Ada, I have > seen horrible things in Ada due to horrible programmers). So, what about fixing the programmers ? :-) But don't hold you breath, GDB wont be able to debug programmers for at least one more century :-) Pascal.