From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5eb8ca5dcea2827 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Chris Subject: Re: Ada OO Mechanism Date: 1999/05/25 Message-ID: <7ifem0$1b4p@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 482126592 References: <7i05aq$rgl$1@news.orbitworld.net> <7i17gj$1u1k@news2.newsguy.com> <7icgkg$k4q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3749E9EC.2842436A@aasaa.ofe.org> <7id2eo$fag@drn.newsguy.com> <3749FF7D.F17CE16A@aasaa.ofe.org> <374AC676.F7AE0772@lmco.com> <7ieuja$5v9@news1.newsguy.com> <7if7oj$bee@news1.newsguy.com> Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com] Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-05-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7if7oj$bee@news1.newsguy.com>, Samuel says... > > >I do know that this distinction is extremely useful in a mixed-method >environment, e.g., object-oriented and procedural elements working >together. > I don't think it leads to clear design when one part of the program is done in OO ways, while another part is not. one either uses all OO, or all procedural. don't you agree? Chris