From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5eb8ca5dcea2827
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mike  <Mike@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: Ada OO Mechanism
Date: 1999/05/24
Message-ID: <7icota$1fdh@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 481716103
References: <7i05aq$rgl$1@news.orbitworld.net> <7i17gj$1u1k@news2.newsguy.com>
 <t7lneeqlzf.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com> <7icgkg$k4q$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <t7g14mqe7b.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <t7g14mqe7b.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>, Hyman says...
>
>Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com> writes:
>> Well obviously the case of extending an algebra that implements
>> symmetrical binary operators is a case more easily handled in
>> Ada than in C, I assume a specific example is not needed here?
>
>Actually, I would like a specific example - 

Prof. Dewar is not adopt to giving examples. He likes to give
theories, but not examples, that is why he is a prof. :)

Mike