From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,33c2f396f345ec59
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: FRAC tool?
Date: 1999/05/21
Message-ID: <7i2ffp$unl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 480335230
References: <hQT%2.24$Wu1.441@news.flash.net>
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990520213104.169052A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x42.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 166.72.71.94
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri May 21 02:13:14 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-05-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article
<Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990520213104.169052A-100000@pluto.mscc.h
uji.ac.il>,
  Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> I don't know of any such tool, but it seems that it should be
> quite
> straight forward to hack something in Perl/AWK.
> What should be considered is which lines to count. Only
type/subtype
> declarations?

No, it is of course far more complex than this. The
initialization expression in a type declaration, or
function calls in the bounds of course generate code.

On the other hand, many other rep clauses etc should be
considered

This is not a trivial AWK tool!


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---