From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5eb8ca5dcea2827
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bob  <bob@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: Ada OO Mechanism
Date: 1999/05/20
Message-ID: <7i277k$1h17@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 480336893
References: <7i05aq$rgl$1@news.orbitworld.net>
 <dale-2105990836310001@r1021c-18.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <dale-2105990836310001@r1021c-18.ppp.cs.rmit.edu.au>,
dale@cs.rmit.edu.au says...

> 
>I actually like the method.operation notation, but I don't find the lack
>of it in Ada a really big problem. It _is_ syntactic sugar, in as much as
>there are no semantic differences that can be attributed to it.
>

Then why do most women say that they prefer it when a man talk 
love things to them in French than in any other language? 

It is true. Ask any woman.

Why do "I love you" in French is more appealing to a woman ears than
"I love you" in English or German or Russian etc? and they respond
better to it that way?

Same semantics, (expressing love), but different synatx (sound wise). So, 
what you think is only syntactic sugar, for others might be more. It might 
have some deeper feelings associated with it, that brings up some images
associated with personal emotions. 

Bob
who_needs_to_learn_french_to_improve_his_social_life