From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f495c7652c09dd8c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Does this model work ? Date: 1999/05/18 Message-ID: <7hs5mm$fhk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 478775809 References: <373e38e2.31311363@news2.ibm.net> <7hmcu1$k8g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37412e95.34501560@news2.ibm.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x32.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue May 18 16:49:26 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-05-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <37412e95.34501560@news2.ibm.net>, jmarten@ibm.net (Jean-Marten Marchi) wrote: > I mean useful for the end user. You have one point of distribution and > don't care about the hardware or the OS. However, your application is > still optimized for your platform. For the most part this is up to the developer and their ability to avoid non-portable system and library calls. There are other ways to make code non-portable, but those are the usual culprits. Ada makes this easier than many languages because of standard support for things like multitasking that many other languages rely on the OS for. Currently the (arguably) worst culprit is the user interface. There are some portable GUI libraries out there, but they each have their problems (lack of widgets, small number of ports, etc). And even that won't help you if you want to run your program on a text-based system. -- T.E.D. --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---