From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f495c7652c09dd8c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Does this model work ? Date: 1999/05/17 Message-ID: <7ho4f8$nn4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 478681706 References: <373e38e2.31311363@news2.ibm.net> <7hmcu1$k8g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37412e95.34501560@news2.ibm.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x41.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon May 17 04:03:52 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-05-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <37412e95.34501560@news2.ibm.net>, jmarten@ibm.net (Jean-Marten Marchi) wrote: > Don't you think that something practical and useful could be > done inside the GNU project? Sorry, perhaps it is a language problem, but that question is quite incomprehensible to me. The GNU project has devoted itself to producing practical and useful software! > I mean useful for the end user. You have one point of > distribution and don't care about the hardware or the OS. > However, your application is > still optimized for your platform. Sorry I have no idea what you are getting at here --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---