From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,36850f7846a01e8e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kumkwat@my-dejanews.com
Subject: global rendezvou's
Date: 1999/05/15
Message-ID: <7hl0uh$omg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 478303781
X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x40.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 209.79.139.43
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat May 15 23:45:21 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 95;
 ICONZ 4.0.0.18)
Date: 1999-05-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

HI

I was wondering if it was possible to have a entry call in a task that
was not only defined in multiple tasks but because it is then I
wouldn't have to specify the name of the task first before calling the
entry.  Basically I don't want to call the entry on a specific task but
just tell everyone that I want to pass an object to the first thread
that calls an accept.  I've got a way via a protected object as a
buffer but was wondering if I could circumvent that and just do it this
way.

e.g

task temp1 is
   entry hello;
end temp1;

task temp2 is
   entry hello;
end temp2;


-- somewhere in the main thread
hello;

-- and not temp1.hello; or temp2.hello;

Thanks
Jason


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---