From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8f32ee66492cfc72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Leake Date: 1999/05/12 Message-ID: <7hcpdo$oqc$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 477131698 References: <37383ab5@eeyore.callnetuk.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed May 12 20:47:53 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Stephen Leake wrote: > "Nick Roberts" writes: > > > I am wracking my paltry brains* for an appropriate identifier to use as a > > base package for a hierarchy of library units I am putting together to form > > a putative public general-purpose utility library. Should I go for > > something pithy like "CAL" (Common Ada Library), or something more > > grandiose, such as "Cornerstone" or "Plinth"? Suggestions welcome. > > I have one brewing too. I chose SAL, which means (depending on the > phase of the moon): > > Stephe's Ada Library I suppose you decided that "Leake Ada Library" would not invoke a positive mental image. :-) -- T.E.D. --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---