From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0d569080889afd6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pascal Obry" Subject: Re: A question for my personal knowledge. Date: 1999/05/11 Message-ID: <7h8oe8$2js$1@cf01.edf.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 476500336 References: <1VEZ2.1515$I51.88140@carnaval.risq.qc.ca> <37372A84.641F2133@bigfoot.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Organization: EDF X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-05-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Roy Grimm a �crit dans le message : 37372A84.641F2133@bigfoot.com... > > Third, training a programming team a new language is expensive. Not > only do you have to provide the training, you have to pay the > programmers for the "dead time". Many companies are not willing to take > the short term expense. > It cost but I would not say that it is expensive. A computer language to learn is just syntax. The expensive part are the concepts like : Information hidding, encapsulation, data abstraction, polymorphisme, inheritance, .... But all this should be known by any good software engineer. Now when you understand all these concepts, learning a new language is not that expensive but it still cost a bit. Pascal.