From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,43ae7f61992b3213
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: les@MCS.COM (Leslie Mikesell)
Subject: Re: [O/T 4 cla] Re: GPL and "free" software
Date: 1999/05/10
Message-ID: <7h8atu$4ou$1@Mercury.mcs.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 476448363
References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net>
 <7h2i00$adl$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7h5rf0$i3t$1@Mercury.mcs.net>
 <7h840p$15i$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: /usr/lib/news/organi[sz]ation
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss
Date: 1999-05-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7h840p$15i$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Robert Dewar  <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com> wrote:
>In article <7h5rf0$i3t$1@Mercury.mcs.net>,
>> >> Like they say, if the two lawyers can't agree, how are
>> >> the jurors supposed to...
>
>By the way, I don't know who "they" is here, but this does not
>make much sense. The two lawyers in a trial will ALWAYS
>disagree, they are basically required to do so, but juries can
>still often reach a unanimous verdict :-)

It was an extract from a joke that I assumed everyone had 
heard.  Oh, well.

  Les Mikesell
    les@mcs.com