From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0d569080889afd6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Sam  <Sam@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: A question for my personal knowledge.
Date: 1999/05/10
Message-ID: <7h79n6$dep@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 476294697
References: <1VEZ2.1515$I51.88140@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1VEZ2.1515$I51.88140@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>, "Siamak says...
>
>Hello Everybody,
>
>Accepting that Ada is one of the best available programming languages, the
>following question comes to my mind: Why BIG PLAYERS of computer industry
>(IBM, HP, COMPAQ(Digital), CRAY, Microsoft, SUN...) don't develop their
>native ADA compiler? (or they disconnected their development).
>
>Do their engineers and managers understand that using ADA can improve
>quality of their software?
>
 
becuase everyone is busy writing Java software now. 

Sam.