From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,99d7d0f239fcea6e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: An ada compiler for RTX ... Date: 1999/05/07 Message-ID: <7gv8hs$jun$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 475213176 References: <7guj56$vu8$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x4.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri May 07 17:40:13 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7guj56$vu8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, sevestre@my-dejanews.com wrote: > I would like to know if there is an ada compiler for the NT real-time > layer RTX from VenturCom. Unless something has changed since the last time that was asked a couple of months ago, the answer is no. By my count this is the third time in 5 months someone has asked that here. I wonder how many times this has to get asked before vendors start feeling silly when they respond that there's no demand for it... The commercial side of the house here has a big investment in RTX, so this became a major issue. We were within a hair's-breadth of finiancing a conversion. The fact that our miliary customer required validation was probably the final straw against it. But the commercial side of the house is way more married to RTX than it is to any new language. They have a lot of legacy Fortran code, so they did finance a Fortran compiler conversion. But Fortran's runtime is much simpler than Ada's and they have verry little legacy Ada code. So guess where that leaves Ada? -- T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own