From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,43ae7f61992b3213 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: GPL and "free" software Date: 1999/05/06 Message-ID: <7gt0is$kq5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 474883731 References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net> <7gqrbf$mun$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7gsrjo$g7i$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x15.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.31 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu May 06 21:11:58 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.51 [en] (WinNT; U) Date: 1999-05-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Barry Margolin wrote: > I wasn't referring only to patch files, but all the varieties of things > that have been discussed in this thread or which RMS considers to be > derived works, such as dynamically-linked objects, plug-ins, etc. Some of > them are not necessarily new concepts (Multics has used dynamic linking > since the 60's) but didn't see widespread use until relatively recently, so > there hasn't been much experience with applying copyright law to them. This thread has been specifically about patch files, not about other varieties of things. If you want to broaden it out fine, but probably you should start another thread and restrict it to gnu.misc.discuss. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own