From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52b937e9712e08a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Secondary Stack oddities w/ SGI Ada 95
Date: 1999/05/06
Message-ID: <7gsj0q$80s$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 474793432
References: <372DC142.1801CEA3@cae.ca> <7gkr0b$e9l$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <37310E55.9E3ACAD5@cae.ca>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x9.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu May 06 17:20:32 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-05-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37310E55.9E3ACAD5@cae.ca>,
  Viqar Abbasi <viqar@cae.ca> wrote:
> dennison@telepath.com wrote:
>
> > I'm curious...do you get the same crash if those two routines are called
from
> > an Ada subprogram in an Ada program, or does C have to somehow be involved
> > for the crash to happen?
>
> C does have to be involved... The all-Ada program is okay.  Perhaps I

OK. My next question was then to be "How are you ensuring that your Ada code
gets elaborated before use?", but I see that question has already been asked
and answered in the gnat-chat list.

I suggest further dicussion should be kept there, as it is the more approriate
place.

--
T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own