From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,71b19e01eae3a390
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: delay until and GNAT
Date: 1999/05/05
Message-ID: <7gpukr$s82$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 474370407
References: <m3_X2.48$6o.1372369@news.siol.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x1.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed May 05 17:20:33 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-05-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <m3_X2.48$6o.1372369@news.siol.net>,
  "isaac buchwald" <isaac.buchwald@velenje.cx> wrote:
>
>   Does  someone  know  the   upper bound  on the lateness of  delay  until
> and delay relative
>  for  Gnat  implement.  on  Win95 , WinNT   or  Linux.

I'm not sure there *is* an upper bound. What if a higher priority task is
running in a busy loop?

--
T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own