From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5394d9ca5f955366 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Mize Subject: Re: pointers & OOP Date: 1999/05/03 Message-ID: <7gl43b$2481@news2.newsguy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 473671782 References: <$DL10CAsSgL3Iwj3@jr-and-assoc.demon.co.uk> Organization: ImagiNet Communications, Ltd. User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-981002 ("Phobia") (UNIX) (AIX/3-2) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-05-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John Robinson wrote: > In article , Matthew Heaney > writes >>John Robinson writes: >> >>> It is difficult to do anything really useful with Ada 95 OOP features >>> without the use of pointers. Or to do anything with any data type whose size may wildly vary, if you want to use it as a building-block for more sophisticated data structures. This isn't OO-specific, although it's certainly true of OO. For instance, you can't have an array of "string." You have to have an array of access-to-string. I didn't see the original message, just some replies. Was there a more-significant statement this was intended to show or support? Best, Sam Mize -- Samuel Mize -- smize@imagin.net (home email) -- Team Ada Fight Spam: see http://www.cauce.org/ \\\ Smert Spamonam