From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,37a004cb543745e2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: ada debugger Date: 1999/05/03 Message-ID: <7giuca$rf3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 473338563 References: <372B1317.6477DFA2@santandersupernet.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x12.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 166.72.81.37 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon May 03 01:32:58 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-05-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Ehud Lamm wrote: > My students don't like gdb, being mostly with PC background etc. > > Does there exist some debugger that is friendlier? > > Ehud Lamm mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il How could anyone possibly know the answer to this question if you don't give some idea of what you find unfriendly about GDBTK! People have all sorts of ideas about what they want in debuggers. Discussion of these ideas is fruitful, but a general message like the one above is not helpful! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own