From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,43ae7f61992b3213 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: GPL and "free" software Date: 1999/04/30 Message-ID: <7gcl7j$9k$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 472719559 References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net> <7g7tlc$j5g$1@jetsam.uits.indiana.edu> <7g8fid$c7c$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g8ip8$skl@www.inetnow.net> <_91W2.175$jw4.18662@burlma1-snr2> <7gce89$94q$2@netnews.upenn.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x9.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Apr 30 16:20:08 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-04-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7gce89$94q$2@netnews.upenn.edu>, hughett@chaplin.med.upenn.edu (Paul Hughett) wrote: > The case is Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. The > Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the claim that Galoob's > enhancement device did not infringe on Nintendo's game. On the game? or on the patent? I had (perhaps mis)remembered this as a patent case. I do not recall a claim that the Galoob device was a deriviative work which violated the copyright (which is what would be relevant to the thread of discussion here). -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own