From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: RSWhite@nospam.somewhere.ia.us (Robert S. White) Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95 Date: 1999/04/30 Message-ID: <7gaukm$pbu$1@odie.mcleod.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 472521453 References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <37278218.ADE17A46@lawson.com> <7g8390$225c@drn.newsguy.com> <7g8drh$1q00$1@odie.mcleod.net> <7g9kgl$adp$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: admin@mcleod.net X-Trace: odie.mcleod.net 925433302 25982 208.16.43.132 (30 Apr 1999 00:48:22 GMT) Organization: ... Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Apr 1999 00:48:22 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-30T00:48:22+00:00 List-Id: In article <7g9kgl$adp$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com says... > >In article <7g8drh$1q00$1@odie.mcleod.net>, > RSWhite@nospam.somewhere.ia.us (Robert S. White) wrote: >> And just why do you need to know the implementation >> when you are just >> an oo user of the object? Can we say "loosely coupled" >> here? > >What has oo got to do with this. It is just a matter of >data abstraction. Abstract data types and objects are not >the same thing! I was reacting to the general oo comments in the previous post. Does not oo use data abstraction as one of its building blocks? But I see your point in that what we are discussing in a more general sense are features of using ADTs. I'm caught again arguing with a professor ;-) _____________________________________________________________________ Robert S. White -- An embedded systems software engineer e-mail reply to reverse of ( add .'s ): net mcleodusa shift2 r white or do a "Reply To All" for direct eMailed cc'd followups.