From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95 Date: 1999/04/29 Message-ID: <7g9kef$aco$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 472269082 References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <37278218.ADE17A46@lawson.com> <7g8390$225c@drn.newsguy.com> <7g8g5j$cmt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <925355990.675.30@news.remarQ.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x16.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Apr 29 12:48:16 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-04-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <925355990.675.30@news.remarQ.com>, "Pat Rogers" wrote: > The ability to argue both sides is certainly one of your > signature characteristics! :-) > > (Said as a compliment.) Thankyou, I take it as a compliment :-) Once John Goodenough and I were planning a debate at a SigAda meeting, where the topic would be announced in advance, but we would decide by a flip of a coin at the start of the session who would take which side, but we did not get around to following through. A pity, would have been fun :-) -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own