From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,43ae7f61992b3213 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: GPL and "free" software Date: 1999/04/29 Message-ID: <7g8fbq$bu4$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 472097781 References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net> <1rlV2.97$jw4.11389@burlma1-snr2> <7g5cb2$bjn$1@netnews.upenn.edu> <7g7o6d$lrj$1@flotsam.uits.indiana.edu> <7g80tn$pbt@news1.newsguy.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x7.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Apr 29 02:15:25 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-04-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7g80tn$pbt@news1.newsguy.com>, Samuel Mize wrote: > For example, a license could require you make any changes > available via anonymous FTP. It could require you to > send the copyright owner a copy of the changes so he can > distribute them. These are additional restrictions, and are clearly incompatible with the GPL, which does not allow additional restrictions to be added. Indeed the second, the requirement to send the copyright owner a copy, is quite an unacceptable requirement, which would make such a license fail to qualify as free software. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own