From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,43ae7f61992b3213 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: Samuel Mize Subject: Re: GPL and "free" software Date: 1999/04/28 Message-ID: <7g80tn$pbt@news1.newsguy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 472054281 References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net> <1rlV2.97$jw4.11389@burlma1-snr2> <7g5cb2$bjn$1@netnews.upenn.edu> <7g7o6d$lrj$1@flotsam.uits.indiana.edu> Organization: ImagiNet Communications, Ltd. User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-981002 ("Phobia") (UNIX) (AIX/3-2) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1999-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In comp.lang.ada Lynn Winebarger wrote: > In article , > Barry Margolin wrote: >> >>You can use other licenses than the GPL, but they have to be compatible -- >>they can't impose additional restrictions, but they can give additional >>freedoms. >> > Just curious - what more freedoms could they give? Please ignore my other reply, if you see it, it was a late-in-the-day mental bobble. For example, a license could require you make any changes available via anonymous FTP. It could require you to send the copyright owner a copy of the changes so he can distribute them. Best, Sam Mize -- Samuel Mize -- smize@imagin.net (home email) -- Team Ada Fight Spam: see http://www.cauce.org/ \\\ Smert Spamonam