From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95 Date: 1999/04/28 Message-ID: <7g7i7c$hft$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 471946256 References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <7g3b5g$p92$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g4ae3$hjh2@ftp.kvaerner.com> <7g4mk7$upg$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3726A2B1.5793E3BE@rocketmail.com> <7g6upj$v5c$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x7.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Apr 28 17:58:07 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > What does GNAT do if it's a generic formal modular type? > I would guess it just checks the rule in the instance. > That's fine for an implementation-defined gizmo, but for > a language-defined feature, we would never want to do > that. except for pragma Restrictions :-) -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own