From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95 Date: 1999/04/28 Message-ID: <7g7hts$h39$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 471943200 References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <7g3b5g$p92$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g4ae3$hjh2@ftp.kvaerner.com> <7g4gjk$luq@drn.newsguy.com> <7g4n1q$vag$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x7.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Apr 28 17:53:03 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > More importantly, Jean Ichbiah was in the > anti-null-parens group, and his vote counted more than > anybody else's. True, but on this point (unlike some others), he had considerable support. For an example where JDI's vote did count more than anyone else's and probably a good thing too, consider the issue of derived types, the vote was N-1 to get rid of them in Ada 83, but the 1 was JDI, so they stayed :-) -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own