From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,43ae7f61992b3213
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
From: tzs@halcyon.com (Tim Smith)
Subject: Re: GPL and "free" software
Date: 1999/04/26
Message-ID: <7g2gqk$ffk$1@52-a-usw.rb1.blv.nwnexus.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 471172786
References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net>
 <7fudch$hsv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3723c38b@eeyore.callnetuk.com>
 <gi71g7.gj.ln@joey>
Organization: Institute of Lawsonomy
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss
Date: 1999-04-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <gi71g7.gj.ln@joey>,  <spblunt@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>Well B has done nothing wrong in selling C the software. Neither party can 
>really sue B because B hasn't broken the licence (unless they refuse to 
>give C the source code upon request).

B broke the license by not telling C that the software was GPL'ed.

--Tim Smith