From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cd962bca2451dfbc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: static objects in ADA
Date: 1999/04/26
Message-ID: <7g26c7$n3v$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 471092808
References: <YsRFDEAtZbH3EwNc@tioman.demon.co.uk>
 <7foacg$3t1@news1.newsguy.com> <4IaN6CA84vI3EwTh@tioman.demon.co.uk>
 <7g1uvn$fjr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x6.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Apr 26 17:05:15 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-04-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7g1uvn$fjr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
  dennison@telepath.com wrote:
> Compiler developers are notoriously anti-OO. Perhaps that
> is because of all the extra work those OO features cause
> them. :-)

What a completely bizarre (and completely unsupportable)
claim. Perhaps you have had the bad fortune to run into
one or more particular developers with this incompetent
attitude, but to generalize it to all developers is
unreasonable.


-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own