From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,42b96374c851ce5a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Ada for numerics computation (i.e. forget Fortran ?) Date: 1999/04/25 Message-ID: <7fvfdc$chc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 470702341 References: <372083A1.45A5EB97@t-online.de> <7fqeua$ih8$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk> <8790bhslfz.fsf@bglbv.my-dejanews.com> <7fvbth$4m4$1@news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x1.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Apr 25 16:21:02 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-04-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7fvbth$4m4$1@news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>, Edwin Guenthner wrote: > There are even some people who think that Java will be > the future in numerical computing (see > http://www.javagrande.org/). Seems unlikely unless the fundamental problems with the floating-point model of Java are solved. The current spec requires disastrously inefficient execution modes on many high performance machines. The goals of absolute portability and high performance are seriously incompatible when it comes to floating-point if by portability you mean bit-for-bit identity in results. Robert Dewar -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own