From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: GPL and "free" software (was: air traffic control software)
Date: 1999/04/23
Message-ID: <7fonu8$q7g$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 469786583
References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net>
 <7fjucn$k4p$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> <7fkl3v$1e2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <7fl5ac$9sh$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net> <7fl9q5$ab7@drn.newsguy.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x9.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Apr 23 03:03:38 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-04-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7fl9q5$ab7@drn.newsguy.com>,
  bill@nospam wrote:
> (Look at how well formated and consistant GNAT code is, I
> think the fact that it is in the public eye, is what
> pushed ACT to do that).

Well perhaps partly, but there is plenty of open source
code that is NOT well documented. The main key to well
documented code is *caring* about documentation!
>
> I find that if a programmer knows someone will be looking
> and  examining their code, they will more likely work
> harder to mak the code better (programmer pride thing).
> I knew programmers who spend years coding, and no one
> looks at what they wrote. these programmer will in most
> cases, not bother too much in improving  their code or
> even how well written and well documented it is.

Hmmm! Well I think I can fairly say that all the code I
ever wrote has been fanatically well documented (e.g. look
at the SPITBOL 360 sources from a long time back). Of
course most of this code was indeed proprietary, and no one
can ever see it which is a pity. I definitely like the
fact that other people can read the GNAT code.

What has been remarkable at ACT is that we have developed
a whole community of engineers all of whom really care
about the documentation and the quality of the sources, and
I am sure that the fact that this code is read by others
and is open played a significant part in being able to
create this community.

And thanks for the nice comments about the GNAT code, they
are appreciated :-)

Robert Dewar (and the GNAT team)

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own