From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,755ddcdc01e691d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Mize Subject: Re: Deffernrce between pubic&commercial Ada Date: 1999/04/22 Message-ID: <7foavg$3t1@news1.newsguy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 469771983 References: <371ea706.0@public1.ktts.kharkov.ua> <371F0EA1.F1D8B33@ulm.mch.sni.de> <7fnjah$2oi3@news1.newsguy.com> Organization: ImagiNet Communications, Ltd. User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-981002 ("Phobia") (UNIX) (AIX/3-2) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Samuel Mize wrote: >> Eugene wrote: >>> >>> ... commertial & pubic >>> versions of Gnat? ... > There may also be "wavefront" versions of the compiler that > fix a specific problem or provide a specific function, which > is not yet rolled into the commercial version. There is one more difference: the public and commercial versions are released under the GNU license and the MGNU (Modified GNU) license, while the wavefronts are released under the super-secret NGNU (Non-scripsit GNU) license which empowers ACT to confiscate your computers and shoot your kids if you let anyone else see the source code. Best, Sam Mize -- Samuel Mize -- smize@imagin.net (home email) -- Team Ada Fight Spam: see http://www.cauce.org/ \\\ Smert Spamonam