From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f1e0b399cd01cb0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Unreferenced lock variables Date: 1999/04/21 Message-ID: <7fjbmt$u74$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 468850503 References: <7ero31$n46$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7esrmv$k1n$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3713b417.22324981@news.pacbell.net> <3718268c.48395643@news.pacbell.net> <7fi0uj$k99$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <371cadb6.1137490@news.pacbell.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x15.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Apr 21 02:04:14 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <371cadb6.1137490@news.pacbell.net>, tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) wrote: > It seems to me that's a > closer analogy in terms of the difference in program > behavior. I disagree strongly, but I have nothing further to add from my previous message, which covers this situation completely. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own