From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f1e0b399cd01cb0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: Unreferenced lock variables
Date: 1999/04/12
Message-ID: <7ero31$n46$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 465310458
References: <x7v4smnszvu.fsf@pogner.moho>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x11.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Apr 12 03:08:22 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-04-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <x7v4smnszvu.fsf@pogner.moho>,
  Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> is there a better way [of avoiding the warning]

why not

 pragma Warnings (Off, Lock);

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own