From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,45b636538f82346e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rmeenaks@olf.com Subject: Re: INMOS Transputer Date: 1999/04/09 Message-ID: <7em3hn$dr8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 464592066 References: <923237140.760.19@news.remarQ.com> <7ebpp7$ruc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7egmm4$tlr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x17.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 152.163.213.48 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Apr 09 23:47:05 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; AOL 4.0; Windows 98) Date: 1999-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7egmm4$tlr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, Robert Dewar wrote: > In article <7ebpp7$ruc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, > rmeenaks@olf.com wrote: > > > Did you get any PD/GPL version for the transputers (GNAT > > maybe). > > As far as I know, the transputer remains one of the few > architectures for which a GCC port has not been done (it > is an elegant though VERY unconventional architecture). > Thus a GNAT port is unrealistic at the moment. > No. There is a port of GCC to the transputers. Actually several ports. The last port was GCC 2.7.2. It can be found on my webpage at http://members.tripod.com/transputer. Another older port was done for the Helios Operating System. There exists yet another port called tracc (a rare one, very very difficult to find) which is GCC 1.?.? I have a copy, but never looked at it. The GCC 2.7.2 code isn't really optimized too well though. Ram -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own