From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bae88297c938c7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen" Subject: Re: "Gone But Not Forgotten" Date: 1999/04/09 Message-ID: <7elpca$egk1@ftp.kvaerner.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 464567706 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7elepj$gul$1@fleetstreet.Austria.EU.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: Kv�rner Oil & Gas Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Werner Pachler wrote in message <7elepj$gul$1@fleetstreet.Austria.EU.net>... >Hi all, > >did anybody read the article published by Joe Celko at > >http://www.intelligententerprise.com/993003/frm_celko.shtml > >Is he just another guy, who did not understand what Ada means? > >And why do people publish such hateful polemics... > >Have a nice day Joe Celko should know. Frankly I don't see how there could be a problem making a subset of Ada 83 or Ada 95. Once you have the basic type and variable stuff, arithmetic, strings, labels and if and goto you should have something that would be ugly and running. It would resemble Ada, but it would not be pretty. His pronouncement of Ada being dead is further from the truth today than ever before. To me it looks like Ada is thriving. Just look at the activity in comp.lang.ada these days. Greetings,