From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,604e0f87aa06eab6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-18 07:34:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:34:26 +0100 Message-ID: <7eee7v4hpvj0i5s345uonlen5315rhiau8@4ax.com> References: <1047665830.579605@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.111) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1048001666 73287211 212.79.194.111 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35461 Date: 2003-03-18T16:34:26+01:00 List-Id: On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:37:12 +0000 (UTC), Georg Bauhaus wrote: >As for fundamental types, in a true OO language there shouldn't be >non-OO types in the first place, so some true OO-languages >don't have them :-) >I'm not saying that any language should be a true OO-language [ If I correctly read between the lines, "any" should include Ada ] However, what if we replace "OO" with "ADT", and then ask this question again? > and nothing more. You meant "and nothing less", I suppose. (:-)) --- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de