From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,334f9012742e58fc X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Britt Snodgrass Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat GPL 2010 available soon (conditional expressions) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <7ec98a71-edcb-4851-87fd-6702fb963829@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> References: <2010061621145016807-sjs@essexacuk> <0fa4c574-9539-492f-8514-d32c68beb22a@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <1frrgtpa5dycl$.12kl72iqsg3dx$.dlg@40tude.net> <4c270613$0$6974$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1wuwvzgwlwgli$.1birkinieia0d$.dlg@40tude.net> <1ur19ais2ejih.mjbgdsv9pr66.dlg@40tude.net> <4c275562$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4c276114$0$2378$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.252.170.138 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1277868087 28501 127.0.0.1 (30 Jun 2010 03:21:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.252.170.138; posting-account=rdRzuwoAAAAyW3CSBhs_xgfCUJSc1aNt User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.86 Safari/533.4,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12981 Date: 2010-06-29T20:21:27-07:00 List-Id: On Jun 29, 8:19=A0pm, BrianG wrote: > > This is one case (maybe the first) I agree with Dmitry. =A0It's an ugly > addition. That was my reaction to seeing it. Its rather horrid to look at. > > Maybe it's a good thing my current project is stuck on Ada'95. > Yes, and I'll stick with SPARK. I expect future versions of SPARK will resist such weirdness. - Britt