From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fedc2d05e82c9174 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Ada 83 - Sometimes still chosen Date: 1999/03/25 Message-ID: <7dbvl2$5bl$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 458697807 References: <87aex3pue4.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <36F913E0.75F51763@lmco.com> <7dbcj3$e0l@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x17.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Mar 25 00:23:09 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-03-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7dbcj3$e0l@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>, Richard D Riehle wrote: > In article <36F913E0.75F51763@lmco.com>, > "Howard W. LUDWIG" wrote: > > >We need to be a little more careful in addressing > >questions of new people. > >The answer Chris gave _assumes_ Ada 95. Many people, > >for whatever reason, > >still use Ada 83. > > Howard's point needs to be emphasized. Here is why I think it is a bad idea by default to always talk about Ada 83. Sure, we know that some projects get stuck using obsolete hardware, software, operating systems, compilers etc, and that is understandable (and not necessarily an inappropriate decision). But in comp.lang.ada, I think we do not want to be emphasizing this kind of stuck-in-the-dark-ages view. Ada 95 is a modern, recently designed language, and it is important to always have the message that Ada is alive and well (not just that ancient projects forced to use it a long time ago are still alive and well). Sure, if someone from one of these projects needs to know something, we can probably provide the answer here to questions about Ada 83, provided the question specifies this (for that matter, this is probably the only place you could still get Jovial questions answered :-) -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own