From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fedc2d05e82c9174
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Ada 83 - Sometimes still chosen
Date: 1999/03/25
Message-ID: <7dbvd6$56q$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 458695620
References: <auWJ2.6969$2G6.3578@c01read02.service.talkway.com>
 <87aex3pue4.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <36F913E0.75F51763@lmco.com>
 <7dbcj3$e0l@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x17.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Mar 25 00:18:56 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-03-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7dbcj3$e0l@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>,
  Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
  It will still be Ada 83 code.


And almost certainly it will still be Ada 95 code, seeing
as Ada 95 is almost exactly upwards compatible with Ada 83

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own