From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.236.63.6 with SMTP id z6mr22281969yhc.47.1418580031320;
        Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:00:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.140.87.68 with SMTP id q62mr2869qgd.8.1418580031297; Sun, 14
 Dec 2014 10:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!w8no7515830qac.0!news-out.google.com!r1ni50qat.1!nntp.google.com!w8no7515825qac.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:00:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1a2fea61-bcc1-43a9-b6e3-edf474308402@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=197.86.175.96;
 posting-account=r0RePAgAAABkc8iAou09Mtfbf-fnKQql
NNTP-Posting-Host: 197.86.175.96
References: <1a2fea61-bcc1-43a9-b6e3-edf474308402@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7d9f1602-776a-4a38-b14b-51f1ad79f413@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Connections to this Crypto.
From: mrvmurray@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:00:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23984
Date: 2014-12-14T10:00:31-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, 14 December 2014 19:20:42 UTC+2, Austin Obyrne  wrote:
> I have been harassed by some readers with claims that there are ways
> by which 'any' data can be called (whatever that means)and encryption
> will still work.  They seem to be saying that this is done by user-defined
> enumeration types  that can be used instead of ASCII or Latin-1. 
> This ploy will not work in this cipher and at best will not be viable
> long-term in the science of cryptology.

You contradict yourself with every post!

A couple of days back, your endorsed the opposite position in a post
right here:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.ada/mDM8cI7JbDU/z39Q-eCoqsgJ

You yet again distance yourself from the folks who you so recently revered.

Are you sure you are able to handle this level of debate; it sure looks like
you have no idea of what you are trying to say, or maintain a cogent argument.

M
--